The GFLI database update, version 3.0, is here!

Download the GFLI database from the website if you already have access, or request a license to get started today!

Thank you for your interest in the GFLI database. The newest database update contains some error correction, a revamp of the methodology and procedures document (now combined in one document) and some updates regarding both the methodology and procedures, and the integration of new ingredients and data projects completed in the last year. The new database contains 1920 ingredients from various regions. Read more about the update below!

Database update

A list of updates regarding the database are as follows:

  • Error correction; some datasets had a mistake in the calculation of the Data Quality Rating (sources as noted in the database: AFIA, Feedgrade egg processing industries)
  • The correction factors for peat oxidation modelling have been removed as it was based on relatively old and unspecific data. This means the default national calculations are upheld without a correction towards ingredients only produced in specific regions of the country. This is only applicable for the statistical data in the database.
  • The database contains a column indicating the type of ingredient the dataset falls under. These will be streamlined in the next database update and may differ in naming.
  • Datasets from the data source: AFP, now reflect the 5-year average of 2018-2022 through FAOstat (for yield data, manure, seed input, pesticides data, production statistics and trade data); and IFAstat data from synthetic fertilizer (consumption).
  • Datasets from the data source: AFP, now also reflect a 3-year average between 2017 to 2021 for land use (change), as opposed to the previous 3-year average of 2014 to 2017.
  • A couple of methodological aspects changed within these same AFP datasets related to water requirement ratios removed for irrigation and rainwater, individual EU country-level fertilizer data from the International Fertilizer Association (IFA), a crop system efficiency index implemented, & a heavy metal emissions methodological update. Details can be read here.

Impact of the update

While the database changes are relatively minor, some impact can be observed within the AFP datasets due to the removal of the correction factors, slight shifts due to background data updates, and the beforementioned updated averages. See Figure 1 below of the relatively changes of total impact of the database.

Figure 1 Percentual change of impact in the impact of GFLI 3.0 products when compared to the GFLI 2.2 database

New integrated datasets

In the GFLI database version 3.0, there are 11 new sectoral ingredients included (based on industry-sourced data), the integration of the higher tier modelled Brazilian data from the research institute Embrapa (from 2022), as well as the integration of the validated 60 branded (company-specific) ingredients during and beyond the GFLI branded data pilot.  

Table 1. new ingredients integrated into the database

Type of ingredients# ingredientsRegional representation:Data source
Pulse ingredients: peas & lentils, faba bean2Canada (Prairie region)University of British Columbia
Cultivated ingredients and processed into silages7  DenmarkSEGES Innovation
Former foodstuff (dried)1BelgiumTrotec
Nutritionally improved straw, processed cultivated ingredient1United KingdomSundown Agri
A variety of ingredients presenting data from companies60VariousBranded data

*Please note that the Data Quality Rating for projects are reflected towards the ‘publication year’. This means a DQR calculated in publication year 2021 would in reality have a higher (less favourable) DQR due to the 5 year time window.

Methodology update

With the database update, the methodology has also been updated and revised to reflect the latest technical updates. A major difference is that the new document now includes the methodology for regional and sectoral datasets, branded data, and also the procedures to conduct a data project. Some chapters have changed in layout, so it is recommended to have a look at the table of contents and reading guide to proceed.

Content-related changes:

  • A glossary is included and a list of abbreviations added to clarify the terminology used in the document.
  • Higher tier modelling is described on how an alternative from the baseline model may be approved through the GFLI technical management committee.
  • Updates regarding the default modelling and approaches, which also includes an updated list of default allocation factors and updated pesticides approach.
  • The procedures to do a data project (both sectoral and branded data) are further detailed with relevant information and combined in one chapter.

Relevant links

We welcome you to download and utilize the latest version of the GFLI database to reflect the industry standard to work with the latest available data available.

Next database update

If you followed the GFLI communications closely, you may see that some topics are missing in the current overview. As we proceed in 2026, GFLI will aim to include a FLAG-aligned version of the database and integrate a system to consistently name and number each unique dataset in the GFLI database hosted on GFLI’s own IT-platform. Stay tuned by signing up to the GFLI newsletter!

SourceInformation about the projectReference year
AFP 7.0Datasets created through the GFLI default method of statistical and open source data (FAOstat 2018-2022), by Blonk Consultants.2022
AFP additionalDatasets created through the GFLI default method of statistical and open source data (FAOstat production data from 2014-2018, FAOstat cultivation data from 2018-2022) that are currently not available in AFP, by Blonk Consultants.2022
AFP – NevediDatasets created conform the GFLI default method of statistical and open source data (FAOstat 2018-2022), by Blonk Consultants, funded by the Dutch Feed Association Nevedi.2022
Branded data (Feb’22 pilot)Datasets conform the GFLI branded data methodology from the pilot held between February 2022 to March 2023. This is company-specific ingredients based in part or wholly on primary data.2019 to 2023
Branded data (Oct’23 V1 methodology)Datasets conform the GFLI branded data methodology version 1, published October 2023 following the pilot of branded data. This is company-specific ingredients based in part or wholly on primary data.Various
EAPADatasets created through industry data sourced from the European Animal Protein Association (EAPA) members.2018
EFPRADatasets created through industry data sourced from the European Fat Processors and Renderers Association (EFPRA) members2021
Feedgrade egg processing industriesDatasets created through industry data sourced from European egg processing industries.2023
GFLI AFIAProcessed ingredients created through industry data and open source data, commissioned by the American Feed Industry Association (AFIA)2021
GFLI BFANDatasets created through industry data sourced from the German Federal Association for By-Products as Animal Feed (BFaN) members2019
GFLI BrazilDatasets created through higher tier modelling sourced from the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa). 2021
GFLI CanadaDatasets created through industry data on cultivated ingredients and complemented by statistics from Statistics Canada for missing data, by ANAC2019
GFLI groupDatasets created through averaging available data for the European region, sourced from the PEF screening study for feed (2018)2018
totals
GFLI Wet-coproductsDatasets created through industry data for the European region, sourced from Duynie Group2022
Individual data projectsDataset created through industry data for the processing, sourced from individual companies with a representative market share of the country in scope2024
SEGES InnovationDatasets created through regionalized statistical data from Denmark, sourced from SEGES Innovation2022
UBC – Pulse ProjectDatasets created through industry data surveyed by the University of Columbia for Pulse Canada (association)2020
UKFFPADatasets created through industry data sourced from the Former Foodstuffs Association of the United Kingdom (UKFFPA) members.2019
USDACreated through statistical data from the USDA.2017
Table 2. Overview of list of ingredients based on the source names are as shown in the table below.

Scroll to Top